I haven't read any Machiaveli but apparently he wrote, "In life, leave atleast 50% to chance, the rest, is cunning." Now, what is embarassing is probably the fact that it is so utterly correct. To be called machiavellian is not something that one would look favourably upon, but I must say, that aforementioned statement is jarring only because of how brutally honest it is.
Compare this to the typical businessman, politician or actor who attributes most of his success to "hard work" and "god's grace". While we are wont to associate a person who, on having achieved some success in his/her profession, by some measure in comparision to his peers, attributes all of it to God, with the attribute of humility.
What is also implied in this admission, is the hidden proclamation that god "chose" them. Attributing it to chance would mean that they were just lucky, it might just as likely been you standing there instead of them... but attributing it to God, now, that shows that they must be deserving of that in some manner. For as you have heard so many times before, "god does not play dice." This would then suggest that these people have something that distinguishes them from the rest of us lesser beings - some measure of virtue or character that leads God to fawn on them, rather than us.
Now compare this to successful 'Machiavellian', who says, "Half of it was just dumb luck."
Personally, I'd choose Machiavellian humility over the godly version anyday, won't you?
Monday, May 11, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
8 comments:
woohoo.. lol at the sarcasm written all over the part
"shows that they must be deserving of that in some manner. For as you have heard so many times before, "god does not play dice." This would then suggest that these people have something that distinguishes them from the rest of us lesser beings - some measure of virtue or character that leads God to fawn on them, rather than us"masterpiece man :)
btw i think ud love this link.. not much related maybe, but ud love it all the same (unless uve already read it :) )...
http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2009/05/elephants_wings.php
Well.. thanks for the link to that amazing post... I do check out that blog occasionally, yes. No one does it like him. In fact, the religious right hate him so much that he got wasnt allowed to enter a preview of a documentary that attacks and ridicules Dawkins, whom he accompanied to the preview. However, the ushers didn't recognize Dawkins and let him in :)
Mr. Balajee care to guess who I am? ;)
Quest
amen Balajee! man! Juniors are all ove Blogville! nice man! :)
@Quest: There was ever only one person I knew who addressed me with that imperious "Mister" Balajee. How have you been Vulgu? :)
@DPhatsez: Well, I one of those infrequent bloggers so won't count myself as part of the demographic, but thanks.
killer post..a short post but really packs a punch!!
Who is Vulgu? :) :-o :-?
Quest
@Apathy Canavian: Yes, I have noticed an inverse relationship between the number of comments I get and the length of the post. Doesn't bode well for my writing, huh? :)
@Quest: I have no idea if it ain't Vulgu. Amit Vijay? Its interesting how you write an entire blog without leaving traces of your identity :)
Post a Comment